Are you sure you're actually avoidant?
There was a time when I thought I was avoidant, or at least, that’s what I was told. That I pulled away too quickly. That I didn’t open up enough. That I left before things could deepen. That I was hard to reach, hard to read, hard to keep.
When you’re told you’re doing something wrong enough times, it begins to sound convincing.
When you’re feeling misunderstood, your brain scans for answers. You see messages like “Maybe you’re the wrong one,” and, because you’re permeable, you attach yourself to them. And because I did leave. I did withdraw. I did choose distance when something in me felt unsettled. I told myself that maybe I didn’t know how to stay.
But with enough distance and kind-sight, I don’t think I was avoiding connection. I think I was responding to it. There is a difference between running from intimacy and recognizing when something is not safe to remain in. Between disappearing out of fear and stepping back because something in you knows that staying would require you to become smaller than you are.
At the time, I didn’t know how to explain that. So it looked like avoidance.
I would scan the room, not for exits, but for shifts. A change in tone. A misalignment that couldn’t yet be named. I would feel something tighten in me, something quiet but insistent, and instead of forcing myself to override it, I listened. And then I left. Not immediately, nor even loudly. It felt like a necessary consequence of my alleged incapability to love. It felt like a slow erosion of myself.
It took me a long time to understand that leaving is not always a sign of incapacity. Clarity without language is often misunderstood, and when you cannot articulate why you’re stepping back, people will assign their own explanations. You become the one who couldn’t stay. The one who wasn’t ready. The one who didn’t know how to love properly.
And then for a while, I believed them.
I took the labels, the descriptors, the fault. Until I found myself in spaces where nothing in me felt the need to retreat. Where silence didn’t feel like pressure. Where presence didn’t feel like a performance review. Where I didn’t have to adjust my shape in order to remain. And finally, something in me softened.
I didn’t scan the exits. I didn’t rush to fill the quiet. I didn’t prepare myself to leave before I had even arrived. I could stay. Not because I had suddenly learned how to love differently, but because I was no longer negotiating with something that required me to abandon myself.
I realized then that I had never been incapable of loving. I had only been unwilling to stay in the wrong places. There is a kind of strength in knowing when to leave. But there is a different kind of strength in discovering that, when the environment is right, you don’t need to.
I can stay without shrinking. Without bracing. Without anticipating the moment something will shift, and I will have to withdraw. I can let a moment take its time. I can let silence exist without assigning it meaning. I can remain fully present without feeling like I am slowly disappearing inside it.
Next time, I won’t have to convince myself to stay. I simply won’t feel the need to leave.




Umi, superb writing. Your capacity to understand the emotional background of the moments in your life is very unique. It doesn’t feel like you are searching. It feels as if you knew a future moment would come when you would be able to revisit and understand your reasoning. I understand avoidance. Getting close to someone at some point feels like all risk. You are uniting with another person, but are they also uniting like I am? Avoiding might be best. But, it’s great that you understand that you were not being avoidant, but following your instincts. Making sure you were not where you were uncomfortable. And congratulations on understanding that in the future, you will fully ready for the right kind of love. A great read.
"When a flower doesn't bloom, you fix the environment in which it grows, not the flower.” - Alexander Den Heijer